The reversal on Medicare isn’t Bolduc’s first since he clinched the Republican nomination in New Hampshire’s primary last week. Maggie Hassan, has said she would fight to protect existing Social Security and Medicare programs. Even Biden has gone after Johnson on the issue, tweeting last month that the Wisconsin Republican “wants Social Security and Medicare on the chopping block every year.”īolduc’s remarks about privatizing Medicare will all but certainly be used against him in advertisements by Democrats, who have long used the threat of changes to Social Security and Medicare to animate older voters. ![]() Mandela Barnes, has continued to raise the issue on the campaign trail, forming a “Seniors for Mandela” group that highlights Johnson’s proposals on Medicare and Social Security. Ron Johnson in Wisconsin, meanwhile, has taken heat for suggesting that funding for Medicare and Social Security should not be automatically renewed each year, but instead become discretionary spending subject to annual congressional review. Now, Vance said, his position is that “privatizing Social Security is a bad idea.” Vance this summer clarified that he no longer agrees with comments he made roughly a decade ago calling for major cuts to both programs. Masters later walked back the comments, saying in August that he may have made a “misstatement” and “I think, in context, I was talking about something very different.” Private retirement accounts, get the government out of it.” A few months earlier, he went further, telling Republicans in Sun City the country would need to “cut the Gordian knot” on Medicare and Social Security for citizens his age and younger.Īrizona Republican Senate Nominee Blake Masters' change of heart on Social Security hasn’t stopped Democrats from pummeling him with television attack ads on the issue. “Maybe we should privatize Social Security. In Arizona, GOP Senate nominee Blake Masters in June floated the idea of privatizing Social Security during a candidate forum: “We need fresh and innovative thinking,” Masters said. ![]() Some Republicans have continued to advocate for privatizing entitlement programs as a government cost-saving measure, arguing that the programs will become insolvent in a matter of years and may not be guaranteed for future generations.īolduc isn’t the only Republican to take aim at the popular programs in recent months GOP Senate nominees in some of the country’s most competitive races this year have also faced scrutiny over their current or past support for privatizing the programs, in some cases forcing them to recant. ![]() Still, the idea hasn’t totally left the GOP ecosystem, despite the idea’s unpopularity and Democrats’ use of the issue in campaign ads. ![]() And in recent years, particularly during the administration of former President Donald Trump, fiscal conservatives and deficit hawks have seen their issues relegated to the back burner while the party focused its messaging on hot-button social issues like immigration, crime and abortion. Privatizing government entitlement programs has long been a policy goal for some segments of the Republican Party who worry about the federal deficit and the growing share of the federal budget those programs take up.īut they are hugely popular with voters, who plan their retirements around those benefits. Thompson added that Bolduc “will oppose any effort to privatize these programs.”
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |